Demographics details for South paris, ME vs Fort lupton, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South paris, ME vs Fort lupton, CO.

Data South paris Fort lupton
Population 2,208 8,829
Median Age 39.5 years 35.9 years
Median Income $42,321 $71,293
Married Families 30.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: South paris vs Fort lupton

  • The population in Fort lupton is higher at 8,829, compared to 2,208 in South paris.
  • Residents in South paris have a higher median age of 39.5 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
  • Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $42,321 in South paris.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 30.0% in South paris.
  • South paris has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Fort lupton.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both South paris and Fort lupton at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics South paris vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South paris Fort lupton
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 97 26
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 53
Two or More Races Data is updating 20
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: South paris vs Fort lupton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both South paris and Fort lupton at 0%.
  • South paris has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
  • Both South paris and Fort lupton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 3% in South paris.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 0% in South paris.
  • In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South paris.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South paris Fort lupton
Mental Health Not Good 18.7% 15.8%
Physical Health Not Good 11.4% 11.8%
Depression 26.9% 19.9%
Smoking 20.1% 15.0%
Binge Drinking 18.1% 17.0%
Obesity 33.9% 30.2%
Disability Percentage 22.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South paris vs Fort lupton

  • More residents in South paris report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South paris at 26.9% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South paris at 20.1% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South paris at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South paris at 33.9% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South paris at 22.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South paris Fort lupton
No Schooling 0.2% (5) 1.6% (145)
High School Diploma 25.2% (557) 16.2% (1,428)
Less than High School 2.4% (54) 28.0% (2,476)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.6% (213) 7.0% (622)

Education Levels Comparison: South paris vs Fort lupton

  • In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in South paris.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South paris hold a high school diploma at 25.2% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 2.4% in South paris.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South paris hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.6% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.