Demographics details for South milwaukee, WI vs Forest city, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South milwaukee, WI vs Forest city, NC.

Data South milwaukee Forest city
Population 20,309 7,358
Median Age 41.6 years 32.8 years
Median Income $68,801 $35,232
Married Families 40.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 6% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 4.5

Population Comparison: South milwaukee vs Forest city

  • In South milwaukee, the population is higher at 20,309, compared to 7,358 in Forest city.
  • Residents in South milwaukee have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 32.8 years in Forest city.
  • South milwaukee has a higher median income of $68,801 compared to $35,232 in Forest city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South milwaukee at 40.0% compared to 21.0% in Forest city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Forest city at 11%, compared to 6% in South milwaukee.
  • Forest city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.9% in South milwaukee.

Demographics

Demographics South milwaukee vs Forest city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South milwaukee Forest city
Black 2 28
White 76 57
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 12 8
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South milwaukee vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 2% in South milwaukee.
  • South milwaukee has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 57% in Forest city.
  • In Forest city, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in South milwaukee.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South milwaukee at 12% compared to 8% in Forest city.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South milwaukee at 7% compared to 5% in Forest city.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South milwaukee at 2% compared to 0% in Forest city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South milwaukee Forest city
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 14.4%
Depression 25.2% 24.4%
Smoking 18.2% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 25.7% 15.2%
Obesity 35.3% 41.2%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South milwaukee vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.4% in South milwaukee.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South milwaukee at 25.2% compared to 24.4% in Forest city.
  • Forest city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 18.2% in South milwaukee.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South milwaukee at 25.7% compared to 15.2% in Forest city.
  • Forest city has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 35.3% in South milwaukee.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest city at 23.0% compared to 15.0% in South milwaukee.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South milwaukee Forest city
No Schooling 0.8% (153) 0.9% (63)
High School Diploma 24.0% (4,866) 15.5% (1,140)
Less than High School 11.3% (2,285) 13.0% (956)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.5% (3,959) 10.7% (785)

Education Levels Comparison: South milwaukee vs Forest city

  • In Forest city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in South milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South milwaukee hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 15.5% in Forest city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest city at 13.0%, compared to 11.3% in South milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South milwaukee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 10.7% in Forest city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.