Demographics details for South milwaukee, WI vs Avondale, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South milwaukee, WI vs Avondale, AZ.

Data South milwaukee Avondale
Population 20,309 91,617
Median Age 41.6 years 31.9 years
Median Income $68,801 $76,496
Married Families 40.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.9 3.6

Population Comparison: South milwaukee vs Avondale

  • The population in Avondale is higher at 91,617, compared to 20,309 in South milwaukee.
  • Residents in South milwaukee have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 31.9 years in Avondale.
  • Avondale has a higher median income of $76,496, compared to $68,801 in South milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South milwaukee at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Avondale.
  • The poverty level is higher in Avondale at 10%, compared to 6% in South milwaukee.
  • The unemployment rate in South milwaukee is higher at 3.9%, compared to 3.6% in Avondale.

Demographics

Demographics South milwaukee vs Avondale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South milwaukee Avondale
Black 2 10
White 76 12
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 12 54
Two or More Races 7 20
American Indian 2 1

Demographics Comparison: South milwaukee vs Avondale

  • In Avondale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 2% in South milwaukee.
  • South milwaukee has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 12% in Avondale.
  • In Avondale, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in South milwaukee.
  • Avondale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 12% in South milwaukee.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Avondale at 20%, compared to 7% in South milwaukee.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South milwaukee at 2% compared to 1% in Avondale.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South milwaukee Avondale
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 12.2%
Depression 25.2% 18.9%
Smoking 18.2% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 25.7% 16.8%
Obesity 35.3% 33.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South milwaukee vs Avondale

  • In Avondale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in South milwaukee.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South milwaukee at 25.2% compared to 18.9% in Avondale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South milwaukee at 18.2% compared to 15.7% in Avondale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South milwaukee at 25.7% compared to 16.8% in Avondale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South milwaukee at 35.3% compared to 33.5% in Avondale.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South milwaukee at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Avondale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South milwaukee Avondale
No Schooling 0.8% (153) 1.3% (1,177)
High School Diploma 24.0% (4,866) 14.7% (13,488)
Less than High School 11.3% (2,285) 17.6% (16,116)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.5% (3,959) 12.5% (11,412)

Education Levels Comparison: South milwaukee vs Avondale

  • In Avondale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.8% in South milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South milwaukee hold a high school diploma at 24.0% compared to 14.7% in Avondale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Avondale at 17.6%, compared to 11.3% in South milwaukee.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South milwaukee hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 12.5% in Avondale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.