Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Mize, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Mize, MS.

Data South jordan Mize
Population 83,513 312
Median Age 34.4 years 54.1 years
Median Income $119,822 $48,750
Married Families 44.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 5% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 5.7

Population Comparison: South jordan vs Mize

  • In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 312 in Mize.
  • The median age in Mize is higher at 54.1 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $48,750 in Mize.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Mize.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mize at 20%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • Mize has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.

Demographics

Demographics South jordan vs Mize provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South jordan Mize
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 83 93
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Mize

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both South jordan and Mize at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mize at 93% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 0% in Mize.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South jordan at 7% compared to 0% in Mize.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mize at 7%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Mize.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South jordan Mize
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 17.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 13.1%
Depression 26.5% 26.0%
Smoking 7.3% 21.7%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.4%
Obesity 28.6% 39.0%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Mize

  • In Mize, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 26.0% in Mize.
  • Mize has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 16.4% in Mize.
  • Mize has higher obesity rates at 39.0% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mize at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South jordan Mize
No Schooling 0.2% (172) 3.5% (11)
High School Diploma 8.4% (6,995) 28.2% (88)
Less than High School 2.7% (2,236) 29.5% (92)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.1% (22,648) 9.0% (28)

Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Mize

  • In Mize, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
  • In Mize, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.2% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mize at 29.5%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 9.0% in Mize.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.