Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Kasson, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Kasson, MN.
| Data | South jordan | Kasson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,513 | 6,996 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $119,822 | $91,581 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Kasson
- In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 6,996 in Kasson.
- The median age in Kasson is higher at 34.5 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $91,581 in Kasson.
- In Kasson, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- The poverty level is higher in Kasson at 7%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in South jordan is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.1% in Kasson.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Kasson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South jordan | Kasson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 83 | 94 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Kasson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both South jordan and Kasson at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kasson at 94% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 0% in Kasson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South jordan at 7% compared to 4% in Kasson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South jordan at 5% compared to 2% in Kasson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Kasson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South jordan | Kasson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 14.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 35.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Kasson
- More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.1% in Kasson.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 22.4% in Kasson.
- Kasson has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kasson at 20.6% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Kasson has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kasson at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South jordan | Kasson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 0.9% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 11.8% (829) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 3.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 23.1% (1,615) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Kasson
- In Kasson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- In Kasson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.8% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kasson at 3.7%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 23.1% in Kasson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.