Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Gloverville, SC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Gloverville, SC.

Data South jordan Gloverville
Population 83,513 3,099
Median Age 34.4 years 31.4 years
Median Income $119,822 $46,643
Married Families 44.0% 20.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 4.5

Population Comparison: South jordan vs Gloverville

  • In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 3,099 in Gloverville.
  • Residents in South jordan have a higher median age of 34.4 years compared to 31.4 years in Gloverville.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $46,643 in Gloverville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 20.0% in Gloverville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Gloverville at 12%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
  • Gloverville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.

Demographics

Demographics South jordan vs Gloverville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South jordan Gloverville
Black Data is updating 18
White 83 76
Asian 4 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 6
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Gloverville

  • In Gloverville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 76% in Gloverville.
  • The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South jordan at 7% compared to 6% in Gloverville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South jordan at 5% compared to 0% in Gloverville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Gloverville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South jordan Gloverville
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 15.8%
Depression 26.5% 24.7%
Smoking 7.3% 25.0%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 16.1%
Obesity 28.6% 39.3%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Gloverville

  • In Gloverville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 24.7% in Gloverville.
  • Gloverville has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 16.1% in Gloverville.
  • Gloverville has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gloverville at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South jordan Gloverville
No Schooling 0.2% (172) 0.8% (25)
High School Diploma 8.4% (6,995) 29.9% (927)
Less than High School 2.7% (2,236) 19.7% (610)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.1% (22,648) 4.3% (134)

Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Gloverville

  • In Gloverville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
  • In Gloverville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gloverville at 19.7%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 4.3% in Gloverville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.