Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Gibsonburg, OH.
| Data | South jordan | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,513 | 2,436 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $119,822 | $67,279 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Gibsonburg
- In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- The median age in Gibsonburg is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $67,279 in Gibsonburg.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both South jordan and Gibsonburg at 44.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Gibsonburg at 10%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- Gibsonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South jordan | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 83 | 79 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 79% in Gibsonburg.
- The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 7% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gibsonburg at 9%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South jordan | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 23.0% in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gibsonburg at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South jordan | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 35.6% (867) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 5.1% (125) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Gibsonburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South jordan and Gibsonburg at 0.2%.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gibsonburg at 5.1%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.