Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Findlay, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Findlay, OH.
| Data | South jordan | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,513 | 40,249 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $119,822 | $54,986 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Findlay
- In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 40,249 in Findlay.
- The median age in Findlay is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $54,986 in Findlay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Findlay.
- The poverty level is higher in Findlay at 10%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- Findlay has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Findlay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South jordan | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 83 | 83 |
| Asian | 4 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Findlay
- In Findlay, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both South jordan and Findlay at 83%.
- The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 2% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in South jordan.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South jordan at 5% compared to 4% in Findlay.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Findlay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South jordan | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Findlay
- More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in Findlay.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 22.5% in Findlay.
- Findlay has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Findlay at 17.5% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Findlay has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Findlay at 13.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South jordan | Findlay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 0.3% (105) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 21.2% (8,536) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 9.9% (4,003) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 19.6% (7,904) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Findlay
- In Findlay, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- In Findlay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Findlay at 9.9%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 19.6% in Findlay.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.