Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Farmington, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Farmington, MN.

Data South jordan Farmington
Population 83,513 23,566
Median Age 34.4 years 35.1 years
Median Income $119,822 $114,737
Married Families 44.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 3.2

Population Comparison: South jordan vs Farmington

  • In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 23,566 in Farmington.
  • The median age in Farmington is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
  • South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $114,737 in Farmington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 41.0% in Farmington.
  • The poverty level is identical in both South jordan and Farmington at 5%.
  • The unemployment rate in South jordan is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Farmington.

Demographics

Demographics South jordan vs Farmington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South jordan Farmington
Black Data is updating 3
White 83 85
Asian 4 3
Hispanic 7 5
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Farmington

  • In Farmington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington at 85% compared to 83% in South jordan.
  • The Asian population is larger in South jordan at 4% compared to 3% in Farmington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South jordan at 7% compared to 5% in Farmington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South jordan at 5% compared to 4% in Farmington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South jordan Farmington
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 13.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 8.2%
Depression 26.5% 22.6%
Smoking 7.3% 13.7%
Binge Drinking 16.9% 18.9%
Obesity 28.6% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Farmington

  • More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 13.3% in Farmington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 22.6% in Farmington.
  • Farmington has a higher smoking rate at 13.7% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington at 18.9% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
  • Farmington has higher obesity rates at 31.8% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both South jordan and Farmington at 6.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South jordan Farmington
No Schooling 0.2% (172) 0.4% (86)
High School Diploma 8.4% (6,995) 11.3% (2,674)
Less than High School 2.7% (2,236) 7.1% (1,662)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 27.1% (22,648) 23.4% (5,505)

Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Farmington

  • In Farmington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
  • In Farmington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.3% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington at 7.1%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 23.4% in Farmington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.