Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Cedar falls, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Cedar falls, IA.
| Data | South jordan | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,513 | 40,746 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 28.0 years |
| Median Income | $119,822 | $71,011 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Cedar falls
- In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 40,746 in Cedar falls.
- Residents in South jordan have a higher median age of 34.4 years compared to 28.0 years in Cedar falls.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $71,011 in Cedar falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 36.0% in Cedar falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Cedar falls at 8%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in South jordan is higher at 3.7%, compared to 2.9% in Cedar falls.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Cedar falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South jordan | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 83 | 90 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Cedar falls
- In Cedar falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar falls at 90% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- Both South jordan and Cedar falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South jordan at 7% compared to 3% in Cedar falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South jordan at 5% compared to 2% in Cedar falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South jordan | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 19.8% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 22.2% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 34.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Cedar falls
- More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Cedar falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 19.8% in Cedar falls.
- Cedar falls has a higher smoking rate at 14.9% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar falls at 22.2% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Cedar falls has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar falls at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South jordan | Cedar falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 0.1% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 9.6% (3,893) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 2.8% (1,147) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 26.8% (10,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Cedar falls
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Cedar falls.
- In Cedar falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.6% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar falls at 2.8%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 26.8% in Cedar falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.