Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Belmont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Belmont, CA.
| Data | South jordan | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,513 | 26,773 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $119,822 | $185,944 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Belmont
- In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 26,773 in Belmont.
- The median age in Belmont is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- Belmont has a higher median income of $185,944, compared to $119,822 in South jordan.
- In Belmont, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 2% in Belmont.
- Belmont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Belmont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South jordan | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 83 | 45 |
| Asian | 4 | 30 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Belmont
- In Belmont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 45% in Belmont.
- In Belmont, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 4% in South jordan.
- Belmont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 7% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Belmont at 9%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Belmont.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South jordan | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 12.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 7.1% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 15.5% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 7.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 20.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Belmont
- More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 12.2% in Belmont.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 15.5% in Belmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South jordan at 7.3% compared to 7.1% in Belmont.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Belmont at 17.0% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in South jordan at 28.6% compared to 20.5% in Belmont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Belmont at 8.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South jordan | Belmont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 0.9% (234) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 6.0% (1,604) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 5.2% (1,394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 51.4% (13,763) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Belmont
- In Belmont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a high school diploma at 8.4% compared to 6.0% in Belmont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Belmont at 5.2%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In Belmont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.