Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Arcadia, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Arcadia, CA.
Data | South jordan | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
Population | 83,513 | 54,857 |
Median Age | 34.4 years | 44.1 years |
Median Income | $119,822 | $108,214 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Arcadia
- In South jordan, the population is higher at 83,513, compared to 54,857 in Arcadia.
- The median age in Arcadia is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $108,214 in Arcadia.
- In Arcadia, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 44.0% in South jordan.
- The poverty level is higher in Arcadia at 9%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- Arcadia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Arcadia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South jordan | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 83 | 14 |
Asian | 4 | 59 |
Hispanic | 7 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Arcadia
- In Arcadia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 14% in Arcadia.
- In Arcadia, the Asian population stands at 59%, greater than 4% in South jordan.
- Arcadia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 7% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arcadia at 8%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South jordan at 1% compared to 0% in Arcadia.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South jordan | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 11.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 7.4% |
Depression | 26.5% | 11.6% |
Smoking | 7.3% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 12.4% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 18.1% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Arcadia
- More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 11.5% in Arcadia.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 11.6% in Arcadia.
- Smoking rates are the same in both South jordan and Arcadia at 7.3%.
- Binge drinking is more common in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 12.4% in Arcadia.
- Obesity rates are higher in South jordan at 28.6% compared to 18.1% in Arcadia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arcadia at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South jordan | Arcadia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 1.7% (927) |
High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 11.8% (6,449) |
Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 7.4% (4,055) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 40.5% (22,194) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Arcadia
- In Arcadia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- In Arcadia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.8% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arcadia at 7.4%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In Arcadia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.5% compared to 27.1% in South jordan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.