Demographics details for South jordan, UT vs Anaheim, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South jordan, UT vs Anaheim, CA.
| Data | South jordan | Anaheim |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,513 | 344,461 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $119,822 | $88,538 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: South jordan vs Anaheim
- The population in Anaheim is higher at 344,461, compared to 83,513 in South jordan.
- The median age in Anaheim is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822 compared to $88,538 in Anaheim.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South jordan at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Anaheim.
- The poverty level is higher in Anaheim at 12%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- Anaheim has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics South jordan vs Anaheim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South jordan | Anaheim |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 83 | 8 |
| Asian | 4 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 16 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South jordan vs Anaheim
- In Anaheim, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 8% in Anaheim.
- In Anaheim, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 4% in South jordan.
- Anaheim has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 7% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Anaheim at 16%, compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South jordan and Anaheim at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South jordan | Anaheim |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 17.3% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 11.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.9% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South jordan vs Anaheim
- More residents in South jordan report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.5% in Anaheim.
- Depression is more prevalent in South jordan at 26.5% compared to 17.3% in Anaheim.
- Anaheim has a higher smoking rate at 11.9% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 15.4% in Anaheim.
- Both cities have the same obesity rates at 28.6%.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anaheim at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South jordan | Anaheim |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (172) | 3.2% (10,878) |
| High School Diploma | 8.4% (6,995) | 13.6% (46,926) |
| Less than High School | 2.7% (2,236) | 28.0% (96,503) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 27.1% (22,648) | 18.9% (65,019) |
Education Levels Comparison: South jordan vs Anaheim
- In Anaheim, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- In Anaheim, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anaheim at 28.0%, compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in South jordan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 18.9% in Anaheim.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.