Demographics details for South holland, IL vs Waterford, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South holland, IL vs Waterford, CT.
Data | South holland | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,685 | 3,276 |
Median Age | 42.6 years | 45.2 years |
Median Income | $79,567 | $74,701 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: South holland vs Waterford
- In South holland, the population is higher at 20,685, compared to 3,276 in Waterford.
- The median age in Waterford is higher at 45.2 years, compared to 42.6 years in South holland.
- South holland has a higher median income of $79,567 compared to $74,701 in Waterford.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both South holland and Waterford at 34.0%.
- South holland has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Waterford.
- The unemployment rate in South holland is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.7% in Waterford.
Demographics
Demographics South holland vs Waterford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South holland | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Black | 83 | 4 |
White | 8 | 80 |
Asian | 1 | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South holland vs Waterford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South holland at 83% compared to 4% in Waterford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Waterford at 80% compared to 8% in South holland.
- In Waterford, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in South holland.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both South holland and Waterford at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waterford at 6%, compared to 3% in South holland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South holland and Waterford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South holland | Waterford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 10.4% |
Depression | 15.1% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 17.5% |
Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 17.2% |
Obesity | 37.3% | 32.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South holland vs Waterford
- In Waterford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 14.8% in South holland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Waterford at 24.0% versus 15.1% in South holland.
- Waterford has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 15.3% in South holland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waterford at 17.2% compared to 15.6% in South holland.
- Obesity rates are higher in South holland at 37.3% compared to 32.3% in Waterford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Waterford at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in South holland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South holland | Waterford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (94) | 0.5% (17) |
High School Diploma | 15.5% (3,210) | 22.6% (739) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (1,623) | 5.9% (193) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (4,142) | 17.8% (582) |
Education Levels Comparison: South holland vs Waterford
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South holland and Waterford at 0.5%.
- In Waterford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.6% compared to 15.5% in South holland.
- More residents in South holland have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 5.9% in Waterford.
- A higher percentage of residents in South holland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 17.8% in Waterford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.