Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Wickliffe, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Wickliffe, OH.
| Data | South haven | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,988 | 12,610 |
| Median Age | 61.0 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $63,202 | $76,938 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Wickliffe
- The population in Wickliffe is higher at 12,610, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 43.7 years in Wickliffe.
- Wickliffe has a higher median income of $76,938, compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 37.0% in Wickliffe.
- South haven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
- Wickliffe has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Wickliffe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South haven | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 6 |
| White | 74 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Wickliffe
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South haven at 11% compared to 6% in Wickliffe.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wickliffe at 85% compared to 74% in South haven.
- In Wickliffe, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in South haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South haven at 6% compared to 2% in Wickliffe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 5% in Wickliffe.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Wickliffe.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South haven | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Wickliffe
- In Wickliffe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in South haven at 24.3% compared to 22.3% in Wickliffe.
- Wickliffe has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wickliffe at 19.4% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- Wickliffe has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Wickliffe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South haven | Wickliffe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.3% (32) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 22.8% (2,877) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 8.3% (1,049) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 18.5% (2,331) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Wickliffe
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Wickliffe.
- In Wickliffe, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- More residents in South haven have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 8.3% in Wickliffe.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 18.5% in Wickliffe.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.