Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Shepherd, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Shepherd, MT.
| Data | South haven | Shepherd |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,988 | 772 |
| Median Age | 61.0 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,202 | $125,179 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Shepherd
- In South haven, the population is higher at 3,988, compared to 772 in Shepherd.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 40.5 years in Shepherd.
- Shepherd has a higher median income of $125,179, compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 47.0% in Shepherd.
- South haven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Shepherd.
- The unemployment rate in South haven is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Shepherd.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Shepherd provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South haven | Shepherd |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Shepherd
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South haven at 11% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shepherd at 86% compared to 74% in South haven.
- The Asian population is larger in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South haven at 6% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- In Shepherd, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 1% in South haven.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South haven | Shepherd |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 28.0% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 23.7% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Shepherd
- In Shepherd, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shepherd at 28.0% versus 24.3% in South haven.
- Shepherd has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shepherd at 23.7% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- Obesity rates are higher in South haven at 35.6% compared to 33.2% in Shepherd.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 6.0% in Shepherd.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South haven | Shepherd |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 16.2% (125) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 8.0% (62) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 17.9% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Shepherd
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Shepherd.
- In Shepherd, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- More residents in South haven have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 8.0% in Shepherd.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 17.9% in Shepherd.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.