Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Newport, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Newport, RI.
| Data | South haven | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,988 | 24,684 |
| Median Age | 61.0 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $63,202 | $81,330 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Newport
- The population in Newport is higher at 24,684, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Newport.
- Newport has a higher median income of $81,330, compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 32.0% in Newport.
- South haven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Newport.
- The unemployment rate in South haven is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Newport.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Newport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South haven | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 8 |
| White | 74 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Newport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South haven at 11% compared to 8% in Newport.
- South haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 71% in Newport.
- In Newport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in South haven.
- Newport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 6% in South haven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newport at 8%, compared to 7% in South haven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South haven and Newport at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South haven | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 20.3% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Newport
- More residents in South haven report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.7% in Newport.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Newport at 24.6% versus 24.3% in South haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South haven at 16.4% compared to 12.4% in Newport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Newport at 20.3% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- Obesity rates are higher in South haven at 35.6% compared to 27.8% in Newport.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Newport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South haven | Newport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.6% (154) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 13.4% (3,298) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 6.6% (1,625) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 36.9% (9,102) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Newport
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Newport.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.4% in Newport.
- More residents in South haven have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 6.6% in Newport.
- In Newport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.9% compared to 32.1% in South haven.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.