Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Mi wuk village, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Mi wuk village, CA.
Data | South haven | Mi wuk village |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,988 | 1,010 |
Median Age | 61.0 years | 53.6 years |
Median Income | $63,202 | $91,848 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 61.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.2 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Mi wuk village
- In South haven, the population is higher at 3,988, compared to 1,010 in Mi wuk village.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 53.6 years in Mi wuk village.
- Mi wuk village has a higher median income of $91,848, compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- In Mi wuk village, the percentage of married families is higher at 61.0%, compared to 50.0% in South haven.
- South haven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Mi wuk village.
- Mi wuk village has a higher unemployment rate at 6.2% compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Mi wuk village provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South haven | Mi wuk village |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 74 | 95 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Mi wuk village
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South haven at 11% compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mi wuk village at 95% compared to 74% in South haven.
- In Mi wuk village, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in South haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South haven at 6% compared to 3% in Mi wuk village.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Mi wuk village.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South haven | Mi wuk village |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.6% |
Depression | 24.3% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 11.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 19.8% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 27.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Mi wuk village
- More residents in South haven report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 16.1% in Mi wuk village.
- Depression is more prevalent in South haven at 24.3% compared to 21.4% in Mi wuk village.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South haven at 16.4% compared to 11.7% in Mi wuk village.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mi wuk village at 19.8% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- Obesity rates are higher in South haven at 35.6% compared to 27.3% in Mi wuk village.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 16.0% in Mi wuk village.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South haven | Mi wuk village |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 18.7% (189) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 10.3% (104) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 25.3% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Mi wuk village
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Mi wuk village.
- In Mi wuk village, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- More residents in South haven have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 10.3% in Mi wuk village.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 25.3% in Mi wuk village.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.