Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Max meadows, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Max meadows, VA.
Data | South haven | Max meadows |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,988 | 580 |
Median Age | 61.0 years | 47.2 years |
Median Income | $63,202 | $73,683 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Max meadows
- In South haven, the population is higher at 3,988, compared to 580 in Max meadows.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 47.2 years in Max meadows.
- Max meadows has a higher median income of $73,683, compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 43.0% in Max meadows.
- South haven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Max meadows.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both South haven and Max meadows at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Max meadows provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South haven | Max meadows |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 74 | 98 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Max meadows
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South haven at 11% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Max meadows at 98% compared to 74% in South haven.
- The Asian population is larger in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South haven at 6% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 2% in Max meadows.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Max meadows.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South haven | Max meadows |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.6% |
Depression | 24.3% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 20.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Max meadows
- In Max meadows, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Max meadows at 26.2% versus 24.3% in South haven.
- Max meadows has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Binge drinking is more common in South haven at 18.0% compared to 17.9% in Max meadows.
- Max meadows has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Max meadows.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South haven | Max meadows |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 37.1% (215) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 9.8% (57) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Max meadows
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
- In Max meadows, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.1% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- More residents in South haven have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Max meadows.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 9.8% in Max meadows.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.