Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Lexington, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Lexington, NE.
| Data | South haven | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,988 | 10,725 |
| Median Age | 61.0 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $63,202 | $63,939 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 10,725, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $63,939, compared to $63,202 in South haven.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 35.0% in Lexington.
- South haven has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Lexington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both South haven and Lexington at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South haven | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 15 |
| White | 74 | 4 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 15 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 11% in South haven.
- South haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 4% in Lexington.
- Both South haven and Lexington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 6% in South haven.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 7% in South haven.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South haven and Lexington at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South haven | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 13.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 16.2% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 45.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Lexington
- More residents in South haven report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- Depression is more prevalent in South haven at 24.3% compared to 16.2% in Lexington.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 9.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South haven | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 6.2% (660) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 13.6% (1,463) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 36.3% (3,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 7.3% (779) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.2% in South haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 13.6% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 36.3%, compared to 11.5% in South haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 7.3% in Lexington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.