Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Cleveland, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Cleveland, MS.
| Data | South haven | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,988 | 10,545 |
| Median Age | 61.0 years | 33.8 years |
| Median Income | $63,202 | $42,005 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Cleveland
- The population in Cleveland is higher at 10,545, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202 compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleveland at 24%, compared to 12% in South haven.
- Cleveland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Cleveland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South haven | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 56 |
| White | 74 | 36 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 11% in South haven.
- South haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
- In Cleveland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in South haven.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South haven at 6% compared to 1% in Cleveland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 5% in Cleveland.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Cleveland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South haven | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 24.3% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 21.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | 41.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Cleveland
- In Cleveland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in South haven at 24.3% compared to 20.4% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Binge drinking is more common in South haven at 18.0% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
- Cleveland has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South haven | Cleveland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.9% (99) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 10.0% (1,059) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 13.3% (1,404) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 21.3% (2,242) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Cleveland
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Cleveland.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleveland at 13.3%, compared to 11.5% in South haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 21.3% in Cleveland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.