Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Ayden, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Ayden, NC.
Data | South haven | Ayden |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,988 | 5,049 |
Median Age | 61.0 years | 44.7 years |
Median Income | $63,202 | $53,000 |
Married Families | 50.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Ayden
- The population in Ayden is higher at 5,049, compared to 3,988 in South haven.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 44.7 years in Ayden.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202 compared to $53,000 in Ayden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Ayden.
- The poverty level is higher in Ayden at 17%, compared to 12% in South haven.
- Ayden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Ayden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South haven | Ayden |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 37 |
White | 74 | 48 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 6 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Ayden
- In Ayden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 37% compared to 11% in South haven.
- South haven has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 48% in Ayden.
- The Asian population is larger in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Ayden.
- Ayden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 6% in South haven.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 4% in Ayden.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Ayden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South haven | Ayden |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.8% |
Depression | 24.3% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 16.4% | 19.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 14.0% |
Obesity | 35.6% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Ayden
- In Ayden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in South haven at 24.3% compared to 22.2% in Ayden.
- Ayden has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Binge drinking is more common in South haven at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Ayden.
- Ayden has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 35.6% in South haven.
- Disability percentages are the same in both South haven and Ayden at 18.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South haven | Ayden |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 3.1% (154) |
High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 20.7% (1,046) |
Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 14.8% (748) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 14.1% (712) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Ayden
- In Ayden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 1.2% in South haven.
- In Ayden, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ayden at 14.8%, compared to 11.5% in South haven.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 14.1% in Ayden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.