Demographics details for South haven, MI vs Arnett, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South haven, MI vs Arnett, WV.
| Data | South haven | Arnett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,988 | 59 |
| Median Age | 61.0 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $63,202 | $35,000 |
| Married Families | 50.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 35% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: South haven vs Arnett
- In South haven, the population is higher at 3,988, compared to 59 in Arnett.
- Residents in South haven have a higher median age of 61.0 years compared to 42.0 years in Arnett.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202 compared to $35,000 in Arnett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South haven at 50.0% compared to 24.0% in Arnett.
- The poverty level is higher in Arnett at 35%, compared to 12% in South haven.
- Arnett has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics South haven vs Arnett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South haven | Arnett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 100 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South haven vs Arnett
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South haven at 11% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Arnett at 100% compared to 74% in South haven.
- The Asian population is larger in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South haven at 6% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South haven at 7% compared to 0% in Arnett.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South haven at 1% compared to 0% in Arnett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South haven | Arnett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 35.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 18.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South haven vs Arnett
- More residents in South haven report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Depression is more prevalent in South haven at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South haven at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Binge drinking is more common in South haven at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Obesity rates are higher in South haven at 35.6% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- Disability percentages are higher in South haven at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South haven | Arnett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (48) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.0% (638) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 11.5% (457) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 32.1% (1,279) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: South haven vs Arnett
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a high school diploma at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- More residents in South haven have less than a high school education at 11.5% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in South haven hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 0.0% in Arnett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.