Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Marysville, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Marysville, KS.
| Data | South gate | Marysville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,926 | 3,423 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,188 | $53,424 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South gate vs Marysville
- In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 3,423 in Marysville.
- The median age in Marysville is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- South gate has a higher median income of $67,188 compared to $53,424 in Marysville.
- In Marysville, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 0% in Marysville.
- The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.5% in Marysville.
Demographics
Demographics South gate vs Marysville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South gate | Marysville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | -21 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 97 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Marysville
- In Marysville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in South gate.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marysville at 86% compared to -21% in South gate.
- Both South gate and Marysville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 5% in Marysville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 6% in Marysville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South gate at 1% compared to 0% in Marysville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South gate | Marysville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 20.1% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Marysville
- More residents in South gate report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Marysville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Marysville at 20.6% versus 16.3% in South gate.
- Marysville has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Marysville at 20.1% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Marysville has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Marysville at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South gate | Marysville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.6% (4,160) | 0.2% (8) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (13,536) | 20.5% (701) |
| Less than High School | 53.3% (48,481) | 12.0% (410) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (6,822) | 19.7% (674) |
Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Marysville
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.2% in Marysville.
- In Marysville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.5% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
- More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 12.0% in Marysville.
- In Marysville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.7% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.