Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Ladson, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Ladson, SC.
Data | South gate | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Population | 90,926 | 15,298 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $67,188 | $74,020 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South gate vs Ladson
- In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 15,298 in Ladson.
- The median age in Ladson is higher at 34.7 years, compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- Ladson has a higher median income of $74,020, compared to $67,188 in South gate.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South gate at 34.0% compared to 32.0% in Ladson.
- South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Ladson.
- The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.5% in Ladson.
Demographics
Demographics South gate vs Ladson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South gate | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 29 |
White | -21 | 49 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 97 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 21 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Ladson
- In Ladson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in South gate.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ladson at 49% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In Ladson, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in South gate.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 9% in Ladson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 8% in Ladson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South gate and Ladson at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South gate | Ladson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.5% |
Depression | 16.3% | 19.4% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 17.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 34.1% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Ladson
- In Ladson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ladson at 19.4% versus 16.3% in South gate.
- Ladson has a higher smoking rate at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ladson at 19.4% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Ladson has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ladson at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South gate | Ladson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.6% (4,160) | 0.7% (105) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (13,536) | 14.0% (2,141) |
Less than High School | 53.3% (48,481) | 13.9% (2,130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (6,822) | 13.5% (2,065) |
Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Ladson
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.7% in Ladson.
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 14.0% in Ladson.
- More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 13.9% in Ladson.
- In Ladson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.