Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Jeffersonville, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Jeffersonville, IN.

Data South gate Jeffersonville
Population 90,926 51,030
Median Age 33.7 years 38.6 years
Median Income $67,188 $67,566
Married Families 34.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 18% 10%
Unemployment Rate 6.1 4.1

Population Comparison: South gate vs Jeffersonville

  • In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 51,030 in Jeffersonville.
  • The median age in Jeffersonville is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher median income of $67,566, compared to $67,188 in South gate.
  • In Jeffersonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 34.0% in South gate.
  • South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Jeffersonville.
  • The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.1% in Jeffersonville.

Demographics

Demographics South gate vs Jeffersonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South gate Jeffersonville
Black 1 12
White -21 75
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 97 5
Two or More Races 21 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Jeffersonville

  • In Jeffersonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 1% in South gate.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Jeffersonville at 75% compared to -21% in South gate.
  • Both South gate and Jeffersonville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 5% in Jeffersonville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 7% in Jeffersonville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South gate at 1% compared to 0% in Jeffersonville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South gate Jeffersonville
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.9% 11.7%
Depression 16.3% 23.5%
Smoking 12.7% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 16.9%
Obesity 34.1% 40.2%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Jeffersonville

  • In Jeffersonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Jeffersonville at 23.5% versus 16.3% in South gate.
  • Jeffersonville has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Jeffersonville at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
  • Jeffersonville has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jeffersonville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South gate Jeffersonville
No Schooling 4.6% (4,160) 0.6% (293)
High School Diploma 14.9% (13,536) 18.6% (9,472)
Less than High School 53.3% (48,481) 9.7% (4,952)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.5% (6,822) 16.9% (8,649)

Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Jeffersonville

  • A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.6% in Jeffersonville.
  • In Jeffersonville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
  • More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 9.7% in Jeffersonville.
  • In Jeffersonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 7.5% in South gate.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.