Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Cuyahoga falls, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.
| Data | South gate | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,926 | 50,655 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $67,188 | $67,922 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: South gate vs Cuyahoga falls
- In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 50,655 in Cuyahoga falls.
- The median age in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922, compared to $67,188 in South gate.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
- The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 4.8% in Cuyahoga falls.
Demographics
Demographics South gate vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South gate | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | -21 | 81 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 97 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Cuyahoga falls
- In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in South gate.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cuyahoga falls at 81% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in South gate.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South gate at 1% compared to 0% in Cuyahoga falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South gate | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 25.1% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Cuyahoga falls
- In Cuyahoga falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 16.3% in South gate.
- Cuyahoga falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Cuyahoga falls has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in South gate.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South gate | Cuyahoga falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.6% (4,160) | 1.6% (825) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (13,536) | 19.4% (9,813) |
| Less than High School | 53.3% (48,481) | 6.3% (3,197) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (6,822) | 26.1% (13,215) |
Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Cuyahoga falls
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 1.6% in Cuyahoga falls.
- In Cuyahoga falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 14.9% in South gate.
- More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
- In Cuyahoga falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 7.5% in South gate.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.