Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Clarendon, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Clarendon, TX.
| Data | South gate | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,926 | 1,948 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $67,188 | $47,457 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South gate vs Clarendon
- In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 1,948 in Clarendon.
- The median age is the same in both South gate and Clarendon at 33.7 years.
- South gate has a higher median income of $67,188 compared to $47,457 in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South gate at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Clarendon.
- South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Clarendon.
- The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.5% in Clarendon.
Demographics
Demographics South gate vs Clarendon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South gate | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 11 |
| White | -21 | 76 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 97 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 1% in South gate.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clarendon at 76% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In Clarendon, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in South gate.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 6% in Clarendon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 3% in Clarendon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South gate at 1% compared to 0% in Clarendon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South gate | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 16.3% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 18.3% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Clarendon
- In Clarendon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.8% in South gate.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clarendon at 25.8% versus 16.3% in South gate.
- Clarendon has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 12.7% in South gate.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clarendon at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in South gate.
- Clarendon has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 34.1% in South gate.
- Disability percentages are higher in South gate at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Clarendon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South gate | Clarendon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.6% (4,160) | 0.7% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (13,536) | 11.4% (222) |
| Less than High School | 53.3% (48,481) | 17.6% (342) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (6,822) | 7.3% (142) |
Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Clarendon
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.7% in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 11.4% in Clarendon.
- More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 17.6% in Clarendon.
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.5% compared to 7.3% in Clarendon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.