Demographics details for South gate, CA vs Canton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South gate, CA vs Canton, MA.
| Data | South gate | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,926 | 23,629 |
| Median Age | 33.7 years | 39.0 years |
| Median Income | $67,188 | $120,000 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 69.6% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: South gate vs Canton
- In South gate, the population is higher at 90,926, compared to 23,629 in Canton.
- The median age in Canton is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 33.7 years in South gate.
- Canton has a higher median income of $120,000, compared to $67,188 in South gate.
- In Canton, the percentage of married families is higher at 69.6%, compared to 34.0% in South gate.
- South gate has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 4% in Canton.
- The unemployment rate in South gate is higher at 6.1%, compared to 3.9% in Canton.
Demographics
Demographics South gate vs Canton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South gate | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1.2 |
| White | -21 | 85.3 |
| Asian | 1 | 11.5 |
| Hispanic | 97 | 2.0 |
| Two or More Races | 21 | 4.5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 0.2 |
Demographics Comparison: South gate vs Canton
- In Canton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1.2% compared to 1% in South gate.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Canton at 85.3% compared to -21% in South gate.
- In Canton, the Asian population stands at 11.5%, greater than 1% in South gate.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South gate at 97% compared to 2.0% in Canton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South gate at 21% compared to 4.5% in Canton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in South gate at 1% compared to 0.2% in Canton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South gate | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 16.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 34.1% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South gate vs Canton
- More residents in South gate report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Depression is more prevalent in South gate at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South gate at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Binge drinking is more common in South gate at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Obesity rates are higher in South gate at 34.1% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- Disability percentages are higher in South gate at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South gate | Canton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.6% (4,160) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (13,536) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 53.3% (48,481) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (6,822) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: South gate vs Canton
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate have no formal schooling at 4.6% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- More residents in South gate have less than a high school education at 53.3% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
- A higher percentage of residents in South gate hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.5% compared to 0.0% in Canton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.