Demographics details for South cle elum, WA vs San rafael, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South cle elum, WA vs San rafael, CA.

Data South cle elum San rafael
Population 564 59,971
Median Age 35.2 years 44.0 years
Median Income $56,400 $113,839
Married Families 47.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.6

Population Comparison: South cle elum vs San rafael

  • The population in San rafael is higher at 59,971, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • The median age in San rafael is higher at 44.0 years, compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839, compared to $56,400 in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South cle elum at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in San rafael.
  • South cle elum has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in San rafael.
  • The unemployment rate in South cle elum is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.6% in San rafael.

Demographics

Demographics South cle elum vs San rafael provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South cle elum San rafael
Black Data is updating 2
White 84 49
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 6 33
Two or More Races 10 9
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: South cle elum vs San rafael

  • In San rafael, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 49% in San rafael.
  • In San rafael, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in South cle elum.
  • San rafael has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 6% in South cle elum.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South cle elum at 10% compared to 9% in San rafael.
  • In San rafael, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South cle elum.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South cle elum San rafael
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 14.5%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 9.9%
Depression 26.2% 17.5%
Smoking 16.3% 11.0%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 16.9%
Obesity 31.0% 24.9%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South cle elum vs San rafael

  • More residents in South cle elum report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.5% in San rafael.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South cle elum at 26.2% compared to 17.5% in San rafael.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South cle elum at 16.3% compared to 11.0% in San rafael.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 16.9% in San rafael.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South cle elum at 31.0% compared to 24.9% in San rafael.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in San rafael.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South cle elum San rafael
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.9% (1,761)
High School Diploma 22.2% (125) 7.4% (4,459)
Less than High School 21.6% (122) 21.6% (12,927)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.6% (116) 36.5% (21,907)

Education Levels Comparison: South cle elum vs San rafael

  • In San rafael, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
  • Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 21.6%.
  • In San rafael, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 20.6% in South cle elum.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.