Demographics details for South cle elum, WA vs Roseville, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South cle elum, WA vs Roseville, CA.

Data South cle elum Roseville
Population 564 154,817
Median Age 35.2 years 39.8 years
Median Income $56,400 $112,265
Married Families 47.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.1

Population Comparison: South cle elum vs Roseville

  • The population in Roseville is higher at 154,817, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • The median age in Roseville is higher at 39.8 years, compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • Roseville has a higher median income of $112,265, compared to $56,400 in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South cle elum at 47.0% compared to 42.0% in Roseville.
  • South cle elum has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Roseville.
  • The unemployment rate in South cle elum is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Roseville.

Demographics

Demographics South cle elum vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South cle elum Roseville
Black Data is updating 2
White 84 61
Asian Data is updating 12
Hispanic 6 15
Two or More Races 10 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South cle elum vs Roseville

  • In Roseville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 61% in Roseville.
  • In Roseville, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in South cle elum.
  • Roseville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 6% in South cle elum.
  • Both South cle elum and Roseville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 10%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South cle elum and Roseville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South cle elum Roseville
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 9.4%
Depression 26.2% 19.2%
Smoking 16.3% 10.5%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 18.1%
Obesity 31.0% 26.4%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South cle elum vs Roseville

  • More residents in South cle elum report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.3% in Roseville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South cle elum at 26.2% compared to 19.2% in Roseville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South cle elum at 16.3% compared to 10.5% in Roseville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 18.1% in Roseville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South cle elum at 31.0% compared to 26.4% in Roseville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 10.0% in Roseville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South cle elum Roseville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (1,136)
High School Diploma 22.2% (125) 9.2% (14,170)
Less than High School 21.6% (122) 5.4% (8,299)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.6% (116) 29.7% (45,932)

Education Levels Comparison: South cle elum vs Roseville

  • In Roseville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 9.2% in Roseville.
  • More residents in South cle elum have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 5.4% in Roseville.
  • In Roseville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 20.6% in South cle elum.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.