Demographics details for South cle elum, WA vs Rogersville, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South cle elum, WA vs Rogersville, MO.

Data South cle elum Rogersville
Population 564 4,884
Median Age 35.2 years 29.0 years
Median Income $56,400 $50,579
Married Families 47.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.2

Population Comparison: South cle elum vs Rogersville

  • The population in Rogersville is higher at 4,884, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • Residents in South cle elum have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 29.0 years in Rogersville.
  • South cle elum has a higher median income of $56,400 compared to $50,579 in Rogersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South cle elum at 47.0% compared to 34.0% in Rogersville.
  • South cle elum has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Rogersville.
  • The unemployment rate in South cle elum is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.2% in Rogersville.

Demographics

Demographics South cle elum vs Rogersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South cle elum Rogersville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 84 97
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 6 Data is updating
Two or More Races 10 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South cle elum vs Rogersville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both South cle elum and Rogersville at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Rogersville at 97% compared to 84% in South cle elum.
  • Both South cle elum and Rogersville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South cle elum at 6% compared to 0% in Rogersville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South cle elum at 10% compared to 3% in Rogersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South cle elum and Rogersville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South cle elum Rogersville
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 12.0%
Depression 26.2% 25.8%
Smoking 16.3% 18.9%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 17.9%
Obesity 31.0% 34.5%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South cle elum vs Rogersville

  • More residents in South cle elum report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.7% in Rogersville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South cle elum at 26.2% compared to 25.8% in Rogersville.
  • Rogersville has a higher smoking rate at 18.9% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 17.9% in Rogersville.
  • Rogersville has higher obesity rates at 34.5% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Rogersville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South cle elum Rogersville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (20)
High School Diploma 22.2% (125) 11.2% (549)
Less than High School 21.6% (122) 7.7% (374)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.6% (116) 18.1% (884)

Education Levels Comparison: South cle elum vs Rogersville

  • In Rogersville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 11.2% in Rogersville.
  • More residents in South cle elum have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 7.7% in Rogersville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 18.1% in Rogersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.