Demographics details for South cle elum, WA vs Ossian, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South cle elum, WA vs Ossian, IN.
| Data | South cle elum | Ossian |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 564 | 3,359 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $56,400 | $56,326 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: South cle elum vs Ossian
- The population in Ossian is higher at 3,359, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
- The median age in Ossian is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
- South cle elum has a higher median income of $56,400 compared to $56,326 in Ossian.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South cle elum at 47.0% compared to 46.0% in Ossian.
- The poverty level is identical in both South cle elum and Ossian at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in South cle elum is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.5% in Ossian.
Demographics
Demographics South cle elum vs Ossian provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South cle elum | Ossian |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 84 | 95 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South cle elum vs Ossian
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both South cle elum and Ossian at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ossian at 95% compared to 84% in South cle elum.
- Both South cle elum and Ossian have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South cle elum at 6% compared to 1% in Ossian.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South cle elum at 10% compared to 4% in Ossian.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South cle elum and Ossian at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South cle elum | Ossian |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 16.3% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South cle elum vs Ossian
- More residents in South cle elum report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Ossian.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 26.2%.
- Ossian has a higher smoking rate at 18.2% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
- Binge drinking is more common in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 17.7% in Ossian.
- Ossian has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
- Disability percentages are higher in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Ossian.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South cle elum | Ossian |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (125) | 26.1% (877) |
| Less than High School | 21.6% (122) | 4.6% (154) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (116) | 18.3% (616) |
Education Levels Comparison: South cle elum vs Ossian
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South cle elum and Ossian at 0.0%.
- In Ossian, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.1% compared to 22.2% in South cle elum.
- More residents in South cle elum have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 4.6% in Ossian.
- A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 18.3% in Ossian.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.