Demographics details for South cle elum, WA vs Dearborn, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South cle elum, WA vs Dearborn, MI.
Data | South cle elum | Dearborn |
---|---|---|
Population | 564 | 107,710 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 32.3 years |
Median Income | $56,400 | $64,600 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: South cle elum vs Dearborn
- The population in Dearborn is higher at 107,710, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
- Residents in South cle elum have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600, compared to $56,400 in South cle elum.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South cle elum at 47.0% compared to 38.0% in Dearborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Dearborn at 12%, compared to 10% in South cle elum.
- The unemployment rate in South cle elum is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.
Demographics
Demographics South cle elum vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South cle elum | Dearborn |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 84 | 86 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South cle elum vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Dearborn at 86% compared to 84% in South cle elum.
- In Dearborn, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in South cle elum.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South cle elum at 6% compared to 3% in Dearborn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South cle elum at 10% compared to 5% in Dearborn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South cle elum and Dearborn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South cle elum | Dearborn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.9% | 13.7% |
Depression | 26.2% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 24.6% |
Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 34.2% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South cle elum vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.8% in South cle elum.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Dearborn at 26.6% versus 26.2% in South cle elum.
- Dearborn has a higher smoking rate at 24.6% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
- Binge drinking is more common in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Dearborn.
- Dearborn has higher obesity rates at 34.2% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
- Disability percentages are higher in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South cle elum | Dearborn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (3,058) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (125) | 12.3% (13,249) |
Less than High School | 21.6% (122) | 17.5% (18,849) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (116) | 21.3% (22,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: South cle elum vs Dearborn
- In Dearborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
- A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
- More residents in South cle elum have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 17.5% in Dearborn.
- In Dearborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 20.6% in South cle elum.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.