Demographics details for South cle elum, WA vs Belvidere, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South cle elum, WA vs Belvidere, IL.

Data South cle elum Belvidere
Population 564 25,169
Median Age 35.2 years 39.1 years
Median Income $56,400 $59,216
Married Families 47.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 8.4

Population Comparison: South cle elum vs Belvidere

  • The population in Belvidere is higher at 25,169, compared to 564 in South cle elum.
  • The median age in Belvidere is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 35.2 years in South cle elum.
  • Belvidere has a higher median income of $59,216, compared to $56,400 in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South cle elum at 47.0% compared to 33.0% in Belvidere.
  • The poverty level is higher in Belvidere at 12%, compared to 10% in South cle elum.
  • Belvidere has a higher unemployment rate at 8.4% compared to 5.0% in South cle elum.

Demographics

Demographics South cle elum vs Belvidere provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South cle elum Belvidere
Black Data is updating 2
White 84 52
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 6 37
Two or More Races 10 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South cle elum vs Belvidere

  • In Belvidere, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in South cle elum.
  • South cle elum has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 52% in Belvidere.
  • In Belvidere, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in South cle elum.
  • Belvidere has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 6% in South cle elum.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South cle elum at 10% compared to 8% in Belvidere.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South cle elum and Belvidere at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South cle elum Belvidere
Mental Health Not Good 17.8% 17.2%
Physical Health Not Good 11.9% 13.0%
Depression 26.2% 21.4%
Smoking 16.3% 19.6%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 16.4%
Obesity 31.0% 36.8%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South cle elum vs Belvidere

  • More residents in South cle elum report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.2% in Belvidere.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South cle elum at 26.2% compared to 21.4% in Belvidere.
  • Belvidere has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 16.3% in South cle elum.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South cle elum at 18.3% compared to 16.4% in Belvidere.
  • Belvidere has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 31.0% in South cle elum.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South cle elum at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Belvidere.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South cle elum Belvidere
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.2% (815)
High School Diploma 22.2% (125) 19.6% (4,933)
Less than High School 21.6% (122) 30.8% (7,750)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.6% (116) 8.4% (2,124)

Education Levels Comparison: South cle elum vs Belvidere

  • In Belvidere, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.0% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 19.6% in Belvidere.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Belvidere at 30.8%, compared to 21.6% in South cle elum.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South cle elum hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 8.4% in Belvidere.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.