Demographics details for South charleston, OH vs Summerfield, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South charleston, OH vs Summerfield, NC.
Data | South charleston | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,696 | 11,111 |
Median Age | 42.3 years | 45.1 years |
Median Income | $47,137 | $148,182 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: South charleston vs Summerfield
- The population in Summerfield is higher at 11,111, compared to 1,696 in South charleston.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 45.1 years, compared to 42.3 years in South charleston.
- Summerfield has a higher median income of $148,182, compared to $47,137 in South charleston.
- In Summerfield, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 34.0% in South charleston.
- The poverty level is identical in both South charleston and Summerfield at 7%.
- The unemployment rate in South charleston is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.4% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics South charleston vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South charleston | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 5 |
White | 88 | 82 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: South charleston vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in South charleston.
- South charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 82% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in South charleston.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in South charleston.
- Both South charleston and Summerfield have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South charleston and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South charleston | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.8% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 8.2% |
Depression | 25.3% | 22.6% |
Smoking | 22.2% | 10.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 19.5% |
Obesity | 42.6% | 28.7% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South charleston vs Summerfield
- More residents in South charleston report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 13.0% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in South charleston at 25.3% compared to 22.6% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in South charleston at 22.2% compared to 10.6% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 19.5% compared to 17.8% in South charleston.
- Obesity rates are higher in South charleston at 42.6% compared to 28.7% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in South charleston at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South charleston | Summerfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 1.0% (109) |
High School Diploma | 26.6% (451) | 8.8% (973) |
Less than High School | 21.6% (367) | 6.1% (674) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (145) | 38.9% (4,326) |
Education Levels Comparison: South charleston vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in South charleston.
- A higher percentage of residents in South charleston hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 8.8% in Summerfield.
- More residents in South charleston have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 6.1% in Summerfield.
- In Summerfield, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 8.5% in South charleston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.