Demographics details for South charleston, OH vs Kilmarnock, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South charleston, OH vs Kilmarnock, VA.

Data South charleston Kilmarnock
Population 1,696 1,428
Median Age 42.3 years 60.2 years
Median Income $47,137 $36,875
Married Families 34.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 7% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.4

Population Comparison: South charleston vs Kilmarnock

  • In South charleston, the population is higher at 1,696, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
  • The median age in Kilmarnock is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 42.3 years in South charleston.
  • South charleston has a higher median income of $47,137 compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South charleston at 34.0% compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Kilmarnock at 11%, compared to 7% in South charleston.
  • The unemployment rate in South charleston is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.

Demographics

Demographics South charleston vs Kilmarnock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South charleston Kilmarnock
Black 4 23
White 88 74
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South charleston vs Kilmarnock

  • In Kilmarnock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 4% in South charleston.
  • South charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 74% in Kilmarnock.
  • Both South charleston and Kilmarnock have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in South charleston at 3% compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South charleston at 4% compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South charleston and Kilmarnock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South charleston Kilmarnock
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 11.1%
Depression 25.3% 22.8%
Smoking 22.2% 17.1%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 15.7%
Obesity 42.6% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South charleston vs Kilmarnock

  • More residents in South charleston report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South charleston at 25.3% compared to 22.8% in Kilmarnock.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South charleston at 22.2% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South charleston at 17.8% compared to 15.7% in Kilmarnock.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South charleston at 42.6% compared to 38.0% in Kilmarnock.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South charleston at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in Kilmarnock.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South charleston Kilmarnock
No Schooling 0.3% (5) 3.0% (43)
High School Diploma 26.6% (451) 20.7% (295)
Less than High School 21.6% (367) 22.0% (314)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.5% (145) 17.2% (245)

Education Levels Comparison: South charleston vs Kilmarnock

  • In Kilmarnock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in South charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South charleston hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 20.7% in Kilmarnock.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kilmarnock at 22.0%, compared to 21.6% in South charleston.
  • In Kilmarnock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 8.5% in South charleston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.