Demographics details for South charleston, OH vs Ephrata, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South charleston, OH vs Ephrata, WA.

Data South charleston Ephrata
Population 1,696 8,476
Median Age 42.3 years 33.4 years
Median Income $47,137 $57,958
Married Families 34.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 7% 11%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.2

Population Comparison: South charleston vs Ephrata

  • The population in Ephrata is higher at 8,476, compared to 1,696 in South charleston.
  • Residents in South charleston have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
  • Ephrata has a higher median income of $57,958, compared to $47,137 in South charleston.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South charleston at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
  • The poverty level is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 7% in South charleston.
  • The unemployment rate in South charleston is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.

Demographics

Demographics South charleston vs Ephrata provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South charleston Ephrata
Black 4 1
White 88 63
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 25
Two or More Races 4 11
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South charleston vs Ephrata

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South charleston at 4% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
  • South charleston has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 63% in Ephrata.
  • The Asian population is larger in South charleston at 1% compared to 0% in Ephrata.
  • Ephrata has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 3% in South charleston.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephrata at 11%, compared to 4% in South charleston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South charleston and Ephrata at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South charleston Ephrata
Mental Health Not Good 18.8% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 12.7%
Depression 25.3% 27.0%
Smoking 22.2% 17.0%
Binge Drinking 17.8% 17.6%
Obesity 42.6% 35.1%
Disability Percentage 23.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South charleston vs Ephrata

  • More residents in South charleston report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Ephrata at 27.0% versus 25.3% in South charleston.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South charleston at 22.2% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South charleston at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Ephrata.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South charleston at 42.6% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South charleston at 23.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South charleston Ephrata
No Schooling 0.3% (5) 0.8% (65)
High School Diploma 26.6% (451) 17.7% (1,503)
Less than High School 21.6% (367) 14.4% (1,223)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.5% (145) 8.0% (677)

Education Levels Comparison: South charleston vs Ephrata

  • In Ephrata, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in South charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South charleston hold a high school diploma at 26.6% compared to 17.7% in Ephrata.
  • More residents in South charleston have less than a high school education at 21.6% compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South charleston hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.