Demographics details for South bend, IN vs Fort washington, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South bend, IN vs Fort washington, MD.

Data South bend Fort washington
Population 103,110 25,825
Median Age 33.4 years 44.1 years
Median Income $49,056 $143,623
Married Families 28.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 16% 5%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 3.5

Population Comparison: South bend vs Fort washington

  • In South bend, the population is higher at 103,110, compared to 25,825 in Fort washington.
  • The median age in Fort washington is higher at 44.1 years, compared to 33.4 years in South bend.
  • Fort washington has a higher median income of $143,623, compared to $49,056 in South bend.
  • In Fort washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 28.0% in South bend.
  • South bend has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 5% in Fort washington.
  • The unemployment rate in South bend is higher at 5.2%, compared to 3.5% in Fort washington.

Demographics

Demographics South bend vs Fort washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South bend Fort washington
Black 25 61
White 47 8
Asian 2 8
Hispanic 16 17
Two or More Races 10 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South bend vs Fort washington

  • In Fort washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 61% compared to 25% in South bend.
  • South bend has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 8% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in South bend.
  • Fort washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 16% in South bend.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in South bend at 10% compared to 6% in Fort washington.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South bend and Fort washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South bend Fort washington
Mental Health Not Good 19.2% 12.5%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 7.9%
Depression 24.9% 11.6%
Smoking 22.4% 9.6%
Binge Drinking 14.6% 12.0%
Obesity 40.3% 37.7%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South bend vs Fort washington

  • More residents in South bend report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 12.5% in Fort washington.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South bend at 24.9% compared to 11.6% in Fort washington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South bend at 22.4% compared to 9.6% in Fort washington.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South bend at 14.6% compared to 12.0% in Fort washington.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South bend at 40.3% compared to 37.7% in Fort washington.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South bend at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort washington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South bend Fort washington
No Schooling 1.2% (1,199) 1.2% (297)
High School Diploma 14.9% (15,409) 14.4% (3,710)
Less than High School 13.0% (13,380) 8.3% (2,138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.2% (18,716) 31.8% (8,208)

Education Levels Comparison: South bend vs Fort washington

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South bend and Fort washington at 1.2%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South bend hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 14.4% in Fort washington.
  • More residents in South bend have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 8.3% in Fort washington.
  • In Fort washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.8% compared to 18.2% in South bend.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.