Demographics details for Somers, MT vs Central square, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Somers, MT vs Central square, NY.
Data | Somers | Central square |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,037 | 1,852 |
Median Age | 64.2 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $54,466 | $58,824 |
Married Families | 67.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Somers vs Central square
- The population in Central square is higher at 1,852, compared to 1,037 in Somers.
- Residents in Somers have a higher median age of 64.2 years compared to 41.0 years in Central square.
- Central square has a higher median income of $58,824, compared to $54,466 in Somers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Somers at 67.0% compared to 45.0% in Central square.
- Somers has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Central square.
- Central square has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Somers.
Demographics
Demographics Somers vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Somers | Central square |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 100 | 97 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Somers vs Central square
- In Central square, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Somers.
- Somers has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 97% in Central square.
- Both Somers and Central square have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Somers and Central square at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central square at 2%, compared to 0% in Somers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Somers and Central square at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Somers | Central square |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 11.8% |
Depression | 22.0% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 21.2% |
Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 31.4% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 61.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Somers vs Central square
- In Central square, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Somers.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 22.0% in Somers.
- Central square has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 15.0% in Somers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Somers at 21.1% compared to 19.3% in Central square.
- Central square has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 31.4% in Somers.
- Disability percentages are higher in Somers at 61.0% compared to 18.0% in Central square.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Somers | Central square |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 30.6% (317) | 14.2% (263) |
Less than High School | 46.3% (480) | 11.0% (204) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (243) | 19.2% (356) |
Education Levels Comparison: Somers vs Central square
- In Central square, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Somers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Somers hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 14.2% in Central square.
- More residents in Somers have less than a high school education at 46.3% compared to 11.0% in Central square.
- A higher percentage of residents in Somers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 19.2% in Central square.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.