Demographics details for Soda springs, CA vs Mccurtain, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Soda springs, CA vs Mccurtain, OK.

Data Soda springs Mccurtain
Population 54 30,931
Median Age 49.0 years 38.2 years
Median Income $28,917 $47,046
Married Families Data is updating 37.0%
Poverty Level 10% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.6

Population Comparison: Soda springs vs Mccurtain

  • The population in Mccurtain is higher at 30,931, compared to 54 in Soda springs.
  • Residents in Soda springs have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 38.2 years in Mccurtain.
  • Mccurtain has a higher median income of $47,046, compared to $28,917 in Soda springs.
  • In Mccurtain, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 10% in Soda springs.
  • The unemployment rate in Soda springs is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.6% in Mccurtain.

Demographics

Demographics Soda springs vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Soda springs Mccurtain
Black Data is updating 8
White 30 58
Asian 100 1
Hispanic Data is updating 7
Two or More Races Data is updating 12
American Indian Data is updating 14

Demographics Comparison: Soda springs vs Mccurtain

  • In Mccurtain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccurtain at 58% compared to 30% in Soda springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Soda springs at 100% compared to 1% in Mccurtain.
  • Mccurtain has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Soda springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Soda springs Mccurtain
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 15.2%
Depression 21.4% 26.9%
Smoking 14.9% 25.0%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 13.7%
Obesity 29.7% 46.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Soda springs vs Mccurtain

  • In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 17.7% in Soda springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 21.4% in Soda springs.
  • Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 14.9% in Soda springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Soda springs at 21.1% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
  • Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 29.7% in Soda springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Soda springs Mccurtain
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (209)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.5% (7,268)
Less than High School 22.2% (12) 17.2% (5,334)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.3% (3,200)

Education Levels Comparison: Soda springs vs Mccurtain

  • In Mccurtain, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • More residents in Soda springs have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 17.2% in Mccurtain.
  • In Mccurtain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.