Demographics details for Soda springs, CA vs Loves park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Soda springs, CA vs Loves park, IL.

Data Soda springs Loves park
Population 54 23,365
Median Age 49.0 years 36.6 years
Median Income $28,917 $56,370
Married Families Data is updating 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.6

Population Comparison: Soda springs vs Loves park

  • The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 54 in Soda springs.
  • Residents in Soda springs have a higher median age of 49.0 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $28,917 in Soda springs.
  • In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • Soda springs has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Loves park.
  • The unemployment rate in Soda springs is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.

Demographics

Demographics Soda springs vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Soda springs Loves park
Black Data is updating 7
White 30 71
Asian 100 3
Hispanic Data is updating 10
Two or More Races Data is updating 9
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Soda springs vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Loves park at 71% compared to 30% in Soda springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Soda springs at 100% compared to 3% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 0% in Soda springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Soda springs and Loves park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Soda springs Loves park
Mental Health Not Good 17.7% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 11.3%
Depression 21.4% 21.3%
Smoking 14.9% 17.0%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 17.0%
Obesity 29.7% 39.4%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Soda springs vs Loves park

  • More residents in Soda springs report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Soda springs at 21.4% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 14.9% in Soda springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Soda springs at 21.1% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
  • Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 29.7% in Soda springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Soda springs Loves park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (97)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.1% (3,994)
Less than High School 22.2% (12) 9.7% (2,262)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.4% (4,064)

Education Levels Comparison: Soda springs vs Loves park

  • In Loves park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.
  • More residents in Soda springs have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
  • In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 0.0% in Soda springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.