Demographics details for Socorro, NM vs South charleston, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Socorro, NM vs South charleston, OH.

Data Socorro South charleston
Population 16,115 1,696
Median Age 39.6 years 42.3 years
Median Income $40,699 $47,137
Married Families 31.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 20% 7%
Unemployment Rate 5.6 5.2

Population Comparison: Socorro vs South charleston

  • In Socorro, the population is higher at 16,115, compared to 1,696 in South charleston.
  • The median age in South charleston is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 39.6 years in Socorro.
  • South charleston has a higher median income of $47,137, compared to $40,699 in Socorro.
  • In South charleston, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Socorro.
  • Socorro has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in South charleston.
  • The unemployment rate in Socorro is higher at 5.6%, compared to 5.2% in South charleston.

Demographics

Demographics Socorro vs South charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Socorro South charleston
Black 1 4
White 14 88
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 51 3
Two or More Races 20 4
American Indian 12 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Socorro vs South charleston

  • In South charleston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Socorro.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South charleston at 88% compared to 14% in Socorro.
  • The Asian population is larger in Socorro at 2% compared to 1% in South charleston.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Socorro at 51% compared to 3% in South charleston.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Socorro at 20% compared to 4% in South charleston.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Socorro at 12% compared to 0% in South charleston.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Socorro South charleston
Mental Health Not Good 18.3% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 14.5% 12.6%
Depression 20.7% 25.3%
Smoking 20.0% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 13.6% 17.8%
Obesity 37.4% 42.6%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Socorro vs South charleston

  • In South charleston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.8% compared to 18.3% in Socorro.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South charleston at 25.3% versus 20.7% in Socorro.
  • South charleston has a higher smoking rate at 22.2% compared to 20.0% in Socorro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South charleston at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Socorro.
  • South charleston has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 37.4% in Socorro.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Socorro at 25.0% compared to 23.0% in South charleston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Socorro South charleston
No Schooling 1.9% (304) 0.3% (5)
High School Diploma 25.2% (4,058) 26.6% (451)
Less than High School 17.5% (2,815) 21.6% (367)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.1% (1,793) 8.5% (145)

Education Levels Comparison: Socorro vs South charleston

  • A higher percentage of residents in Socorro have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.3% in South charleston.
  • In South charleston, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.6% compared to 25.2% in Socorro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South charleston at 21.6%, compared to 17.5% in Socorro.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Socorro hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.5% in South charleston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.