Demographics details for Socorro, NM vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Socorro, NM vs Gibsonburg, OH.
Data | Socorro | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,115 | 2,436 |
Median Age | 39.6 years | 38.7 years |
Median Income | $40,699 | $67,279 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Socorro vs Gibsonburg
- In Socorro, the population is higher at 16,115, compared to 2,436 in Gibsonburg.
- Residents in Socorro have a higher median age of 39.6 years compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279, compared to $40,699 in Socorro.
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 31.0% in Socorro.
- Socorro has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- The unemployment rate in Socorro is higher at 5.6%, compared to 4.3% in Gibsonburg.
Demographics
Demographics Socorro vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Socorro | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 14 | 79 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 51 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 20 | 9 |
American Indian | 12 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Socorro vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Socorro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 14% in Socorro.
- The Asian population is larger in Socorro at 2% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Socorro at 51% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Socorro at 20% compared to 9% in Gibsonburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Socorro at 12% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Socorro | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 12.3% |
Depression | 20.7% | 23.0% |
Smoking | 20.0% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Socorro vs Gibsonburg
- More residents in Socorro report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.6% in Gibsonburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gibsonburg at 23.0% versus 20.7% in Socorro.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 20.0% in Socorro.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gibsonburg at 18.4% compared to 13.6% in Socorro.
- Gibsonburg has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 37.4% in Socorro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Socorro at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Socorro | Gibsonburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.9% (304) | 0.2% (4) |
High School Diploma | 25.2% (4,058) | 35.6% (867) |
Less than High School | 17.5% (2,815) | 5.1% (125) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (1,793) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: Socorro vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Socorro have no formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 25.2% in Socorro.
- More residents in Socorro have less than a high school education at 17.5% compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 11.1% in Socorro.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.