Demographics details for Social circle, GA vs Pioneer, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Social circle, GA vs Pioneer, CA.
Data | Social circle | Pioneer |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,265 | 1,322 |
Median Age | 36.8 years | 58.8 years |
Median Income | $68,333 | $71,278 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 51.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Social circle vs Pioneer
- In Social circle, the population is higher at 5,265, compared to 1,322 in Pioneer.
- The median age in Pioneer is higher at 58.8 years, compared to 36.8 years in Social circle.
- Pioneer has a higher median income of $71,278, compared to $68,333 in Social circle.
- In Pioneer, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 41.0% in Social circle.
- The poverty level is identical in both Social circle and Pioneer at 10%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Social circle and Pioneer at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Social circle vs Pioneer provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Social circle | Pioneer |
---|---|---|
Black | 31 | Data is updating |
White | 67 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 22 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Social circle vs Pioneer
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Social circle at 31% compared to 0% in Pioneer.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pioneer at 74% compared to 67% in Social circle.
- Both Social circle and Pioneer have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Pioneer has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 2% in Social circle.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pioneer at 4%, compared to 0% in Social circle.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Social circle and Pioneer at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Social circle | Pioneer |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 17.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.0% | 10.9% |
Depression | 22.4% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 19.5% | 13.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 38.3% | 29.0% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Social circle vs Pioneer
- More residents in Social circle report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.4% in Pioneer.
- Depression is more prevalent in Social circle at 22.4% compared to 22.1% in Pioneer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Social circle at 19.5% compared to 13.9% in Pioneer.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pioneer at 19.0% compared to 15.3% in Social circle.
- Obesity rates are higher in Social circle at 38.3% compared to 29.0% in Pioneer.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Social circle and Pioneer at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Social circle | Pioneer |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (39) | 0.7% (9) |
High School Diploma | 16.6% (872) | 16.6% (220) |
Less than High School | 8.8% (462) | 6.1% (80) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (914) | 11.9% (157) |
Education Levels Comparison: Social circle vs Pioneer
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Social circle and Pioneer at 0.7%.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 16.6%.
- More residents in Social circle have less than a high school education at 8.8% compared to 6.1% in Pioneer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Social circle hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 11.9% in Pioneer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.