Demographics details for Snover, MI vs Gretna, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snover, MI vs Gretna, NE.
| Data | Snover | Gretna |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 260 | 9,071 |
| Median Age | 51.5 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $44,948 | $117,553 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Snover vs Gretna
- The population in Gretna is higher at 9,071, compared to 260 in Snover.
- Residents in Snover have a higher median age of 51.5 years compared to 35.7 years in Gretna.
- Gretna has a higher median income of $117,553, compared to $44,948 in Snover.
- In Gretna, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 41.0% in Snover.
- Snover has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Gretna.
- The unemployment rate in Snover is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Gretna.
Demographics
Demographics Snover vs Gretna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snover | Gretna |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 97 | 93 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snover vs Gretna
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Snover and Gretna at 0%.
- Snover has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 93% in Gretna.
- The Asian population is larger in Snover at 3% compared to 0% in Gretna.
- Gretna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Snover.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gretna at 3%, compared to 0% in Snover.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snover and Gretna at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snover | Gretna |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 12.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 7.0% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 21.8% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snover vs Gretna
- More residents in Snover report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 12.0% in Gretna.
- Depression is more prevalent in Snover at 26.5% compared to 17.5% in Gretna.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Snover at 22.9% compared to 11.0% in Gretna.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gretna at 21.8% compared to 17.4% in Snover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Snover at 35.3% compared to 35.0% in Gretna.
- Disability percentages are higher in Snover at 17.0% compared to 7.0% in Gretna.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snover | Gretna |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 36.5% (95) | 10.9% (988) |
| Less than High School | 29.2% (76) | 2.8% (252) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.9% (5) | 31.3% (2,839) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snover vs Gretna
- In Gretna, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Snover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snover hold a high school diploma at 36.5% compared to 10.9% in Gretna.
- More residents in Snover have less than a high school education at 29.2% compared to 2.8% in Gretna.
- In Gretna, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.3% compared to 1.9% in Snover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.