Demographics details for Snover, MI vs Alum creek, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snover, MI vs Alum creek, WV.
| Data | Snover | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 260 | 1,420 |
| Median Age | 51.5 years | 47.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,948 | $65,179 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Snover vs Alum creek
- The population in Alum creek is higher at 1,420, compared to 260 in Snover.
- Residents in Snover have a higher median age of 51.5 years compared to 47.4 years in Alum creek.
- Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $44,948 in Snover.
- In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 41.0% in Snover.
- The poverty level is higher in Alum creek at 10%, compared to 9% in Snover.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Snover and Alum creek at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Snover vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snover | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 97 | 100 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snover vs Alum creek
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Snover and Alum creek at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to 97% in Snover.
- The Asian population is larger in Snover at 3% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Snover and Alum creek at 0%.
- Both Snover and Alum creek have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snover and Alum creek at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snover | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.9% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 26.5% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 22.9% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.4% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.3% | 40.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 30.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snover vs Alum creek
- In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.9% in Snover.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 26.5% in Snover.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Snover at 22.9% compared to 20.6% in Alum creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snover at 17.4% compared to 15.1% in Alum creek.
- Alum creek has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 35.3% in Snover.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 17.0% in Snover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snover | Alum creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 36.5% (95) | 34.9% (496) |
| Less than High School | 29.2% (76) | 8.9% (126) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.9% (5) | 9.7% (138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snover vs Alum creek
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Snover and Alum creek at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snover hold a high school diploma at 36.5% compared to 34.9% in Alum creek.
- More residents in Snover have less than a high school education at 29.2% compared to 8.9% in Alum creek.
- In Alum creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 1.9% in Snover.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.