Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Provo, UT.
| Data | Snoqualmie | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,621 | 113,523 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 23.6 years |
| Median Income | $186,353 | $57,943 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 13,621 in Snoqualmie.
- Residents in Snoqualmie have a higher median age of 38.6 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- The poverty level is higher in Provo at 11%, compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- Provo has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snoqualmie | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 1 |
| White | 77 | 69 |
| Asian | 11 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Provo
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Provo at 1%.
- Snoqualmie has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 69% in Provo.
- The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 2% in Provo.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 7% in Snoqualmie.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Snoqualmie.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | 8.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 7.3% |
| Obesity | 21.9% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Provo
- In Provo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Provo at 24.5% versus 23.9% in Snoqualmie.
- Provo has a higher smoking rate at 8.4% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Provo has higher obesity rates at 33.5% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Provo at 10.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snoqualmie | Provo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 0.6% (663) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 4.6% (5,209) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 5.7% (6,435) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a high school diploma at 5.8% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Provo at 5.7%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 18.3% in Provo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.