Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Pearblossom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Pearblossom, CA.
| Data | Snoqualmie | Pearblossom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,621 | 1,390 |
| Median Age | 38.6 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $186,353 | $55,000 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 3% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Pearblossom
- In Snoqualmie, the population is higher at 13,621, compared to 1,390 in Pearblossom.
- The median age in Pearblossom is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $55,000 in Pearblossom.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 30.0% in Pearblossom.
- The poverty level is higher in Pearblossom at 15%, compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- Pearblossom has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Pearblossom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Snoqualmie | Pearblossom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 77 | 90 |
| Asian | 11 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Pearblossom
- In Pearblossom, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pearblossom at 90% compared to 77% in Snoqualmie.
- The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 1% in Pearblossom.
- Pearblossom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 4% in Snoqualmie.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Snoqualmie at 7% compared to 2% in Pearblossom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Pearblossom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Pearblossom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.9% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 7.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 21.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Pearblossom
- More residents in Snoqualmie report poor mental health at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- Obesity rates are higher in Snoqualmie at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Snoqualmie at 4.0% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Snoqualmie | Pearblossom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Pearblossom
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a high school diploma at 5.8% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- More residents in Snoqualmie have less than a high school education at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 0.0% in Pearblossom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.