Demographics details for Snoqualmie, WA vs Lacon, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Snoqualmie, WA vs Lacon, IL.
Data | Snoqualmie | Lacon |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,621 | 1,864 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 45.3 years |
Median Income | $186,353 | $57,262 |
Married Families | 53.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 3% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Lacon
- In Snoqualmie, the population is higher at 13,621, compared to 1,864 in Lacon.
- The median age in Lacon is higher at 45.3 years, compared to 38.6 years in Snoqualmie.
- Snoqualmie has a higher median income of $186,353 compared to $57,262 in Lacon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Snoqualmie at 53.0% compared to 41.0% in Lacon.
- The poverty level is higher in Lacon at 9%, compared to 3% in Snoqualmie.
- Lacon has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Snoqualmie.
Demographics
Demographics Snoqualmie vs Lacon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Snoqualmie | Lacon |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 77 | 98 |
Asian | 11 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Lacon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Snoqualmie at 1% compared to 0% in Lacon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lacon at 98% compared to 77% in Snoqualmie.
- The Asian population is larger in Snoqualmie at 11% compared to 0% in Lacon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Snoqualmie at 4% compared to 2% in Lacon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Snoqualmie at 7% compared to 0% in Lacon.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Snoqualmie and Lacon at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Snoqualmie | Lacon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.1% | 16.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 10.8% |
Depression | 23.9% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 7.3% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 21.9% | 35.6% |
Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Lacon
- In Lacon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.1% in Snoqualmie.
- Depression is more prevalent in Snoqualmie at 23.9% compared to 22.1% in Lacon.
- Lacon has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 7.3% in Snoqualmie.
- Binge drinking is more common in Snoqualmie at 19.3% compared to 18.4% in Lacon.
- Lacon has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 21.9% in Snoqualmie.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lacon at 12.0% compared to 4.0% in Snoqualmie.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Snoqualmie | Lacon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (34) | 1.1% (21) |
High School Diploma | 5.8% (792) | 26.4% (492) |
Less than High School | 1.5% (209) | 7.7% (143) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 45.3% (6,177) | 8.4% (157) |
Education Levels Comparison: Snoqualmie vs Lacon
- In Lacon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Snoqualmie.
- In Lacon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 5.8% in Snoqualmie.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lacon at 7.7%, compared to 1.5% in Snoqualmie.
- A higher percentage of residents in Snoqualmie hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.3% compared to 8.4% in Lacon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.